Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Learning Design and Academic Tech Integration

Pulled from the December 2013 PIIC (Pennsylvania Institute for Instructional Coaching) site...

Instructional coaches are positioned to encourage ongoing conversations about teaching and learning in ways that are reflective, deliberate, and challenging.

It means that coaches and teachers work together and “walk the talk” about innovation, collaboration, and critical thinking.

They need to work together to focus on authentic issues and problem-solve to gather the collective wisdom of the group.


Time and conversations...building trust, building understanding, putting pieces together over time...

Monday, December 30, 2013

Faux Flipped

This post is a reminder to an idea that I came across in my travels...

It's called Faux Flipped.  One of these days, I'll remember where I found it and properly give attribution, but in the meantime, here's the idea.

Faux Flipped - intended for an elementary experience...
Basically, since many students do not have internet access at home, they (and everyone) watch any video or screen-casts at school.  But, both are accessible online, where parents can also go to watch with children to help with any homework questions that may arise outside of school.

Students complete a checklist associated with the content, which is used as a "ticket" to move to a group in class.

Another excellent idea on the same note sheet!
Here's the concept
Students work toward TEST OPPORTUNITIES - students earn the right to test...

And finally, Flip-charts in Promethean can be saved as a PDF and imported into Nearpod.
Formative questions can be interspersed throughout.  (e.g. 2 questions - less than 5 minutes)
What a lesson enhancement!

Sunday, December 29, 2013

A series of answers

An older post I came across...found it in drafts... 
Thinking about thinking again...came across this post from The Core Knowledge Blog

If we only...view school work as a series of answers.

Sometimes I think that we are so eager to get to answers, that time for students to develop questions is overlooked.

But it’s the question that draws interest; draws action; draws thinking.

Simply supplying answers to questions someone else devises, is it enough?

So, how do we design learning for students to frame questions that extract desired content with enough difficulty to keep students engaged, but not frustrated?  
Quite a question... 

Daniel T. Willingham - Why Students Don't Like School

Intro to Comp - Parody Projects

Students in Mrs. Rasmus' Introduction to Composition classes read and analyzed the book "The Chocolate War" by Robert Cormier during the late fall of 2012. 

To broaden the scope of understanding and in addition to other  curricular assessments involving  the novel, it was decided to use a specific scene from the novel to teach process skills using a genre of literary composition -  parody. 

Often students are given project assignments that span over several days and involve several necessary components to be successful.  We structured this project to be "different" in several ways.

First, the concept of parody was introduced by showing examples of parody from popular culture.  Students compared and contrasted the parodies to the original versions.  Next, the overall project goal, as related to "The Chocolate War"  was shared on this day.

The following day, we started class with an invented "game" called "What's My Passion:  The Process".

Student groups were given a folder that contained visuals of each step of the process, along with labels for each step.  Their first task was to align the visual representations with the label, then put the steps in a logical, sequential order. 

Pictures/photocopies included:

Labels included:

Once the groups had labeled and organized the pieces, the class revealed their sequence choices by having mates line up according to a consensus as to what comes first, second, etc...  Some of the steps were obvious, while other steps required some discussion about WHY you might do one step before another.

Once we came to a general agreement on "the steps", they were taped in order on a large sheet of paper that spanned the wall. 

The following day, student groups selected their parody characters and selected their end product medium, either a PowerPoint or a GoAnimate video.  BEFORE they could get a laptop, they had to run through the process steps posted on the wall WITH US  and checkmark the ones they had already completed.  By doing this, they could "see" which ones they still needed to do. 

This activity provided an opportunity for them to make choices about how to proceed, not only for that moment but also as a means to decide what they needed to accomplish during that period and where to start the next day.  The visual sequence created a workflow for them to reference.  It also provided us an opportunity to conference with them about their progress.  We shared an understanding of what each step "meant" and a language to use as we worked through the process.

A second piece was added to the process wall the following class day:  a series of boxes depicting the school days allotted to complete the finished product.  The first box read, "You are here". 

We spoke of how many days remaining, as aligned with what needed to be done.  Again, students had the opportunity to "see" process components, "see" the due date and all the date boxes leading up to the "bulls-eye".   The visual helped them to plan, to self-direct. 

We did insist that the groups needed to complete one set (six slides) of a storyboard before they could move the process to create using PowerPoint or GoAnimate.  We felt it was important for them to do some planning first before adding the technology.

From that point on, in each empty date box, we plotted progress as we approached and passed the class time.

 On the Monday of the week the project was due, each individual was asked to answer the following 4 questions using a sticky note to post their replies on the process wall as they left class that day.

Again, the feedback helped us to target students who needed a bit of guidance and also gave them an opportunity to frame their own progression to this point.

The remaining classtime was spent
GoAnimate.com: The+Chocolate+War+Parody by 2500550


Like it? Create your own at GoAnimate.com. It's free and fun!

Two new terms...

Came across two new terms...

Crystallized intelligence - knowledge and skills students acquire in school

Fluid intelligence - describes the ability to analyze abstract problems and think logically

Schaffhauser, Dian. "Research: Improving Test Scores Doesn't Equate to Improving Abstract Reasoning." THE Journal. 1105 Media, Inc., 12 Dec. 2013. Web. 29 Dec. 2013. .

Preaching to the choir...or sharing another perspective?

Merina, Anita. "Managing the Technology Takeover." NEA Today Summer 2013: 21. Print.

Initially approached iPads as supplements to lessons

Didn't realize that what needed to do was rethink lesson plans from an integration perspective

As a creation

Teaching like it 2999 - Blog - 32 iPads in class - initial failure was relying on traditional pedagogy

QUESTION - What can I do w/these devices that would be impossible to do without them?

Increased student as creator experiences - moved from paper to math app games, to students creating own math videos and writing math blogs, to conducting Challenge Based Learning math projects

Also, found apps to assess student learning

TECHNOLOGY IS JUST A CATALYST FOR LEARNING. IT'S STILL THE TEACHER THAT'S KEY.

With tech, the goal is to create projects that do more than deliver info - but also prompt students to THINK and SOLVE

AND for teachers to ASSESS

Use tools for PB approaches - and don't be "afraid" to reexamine teaching

This is nice...Kudos to Thinkfinity and the ReadWriteThink Printing Press

ReadWriteThink's Printing Press is a tool to create online brochures, newspapers, and posters.

An added bonus is that students can save a draft and return to their work anytime to continue where they left off.

As Recommended via an EdSurge list - Dec. 2013